A Twitter posting by Courtney Love suggesting that one of her attorneys had been "bought off" wasn't defamatory, a jury decided Friday.
The verdict came after roughly three hours of deliberation in a case that spanned eight days and focused on the Hole frontwoman's postings on the social networking site. The case centered on one 2010 post that suggested that San Diego attorney Rhonda Holmes had been "bought off" and that was why she wasn't representing the singer anymore.
Fired by Love
Love had hired Holmes to file a fraud case against the estate of her late husband, Kurt Cobain. The lawyer contended during the trial that she was fired by Love and that the tweet and other statements the singer made against her have caused her substantial damages.
'I was (expletive) devastated when Rhonda J Holmes Esq of san diego was bought off'- Courtney Love's alleged tweet
Love's tweet stated, "I was (expletive) devastated when Rhonda J Holmes Esq of san diego was bought off" in response to a question from a user of the popular social media site.
The message was never meant to be public, Love told jurors. She said she meant for it to be sent as a direct message, which only the recipient would see, but it instead went public and was quickly deleted.
Swift verdict
The swift verdict wasn't witnessed by Love, who had left court after closing arguments ended Friday morning. She arrived just as the courthouse was closing down and met her attorneys, John Lawrence and Matthew Bures, in the hallway where she hugged them both.
Love praised her attorneys and the jury after the verdict. Asked about her social media presence, Love said she refrained from posting on Twitter during the trial. "I didn't tweet out of respect for the case," she said.
First 'Twibel' trial
While the case was billed as the first "Twibel" trial in which Twitter and libel law intersected, Lawrence said it was tried by the same rules as traditional defamation cases.
Jurors determined that Love's tweet included false information, but the musician didn't know it wasn't true.
Holmes' attorneys urged jurors in closing arguments to award the attorney $8 million and send a message that false statements online had consequences.
Holmes' lawyer Mitchell Langberg said that while his client was disappointed with the verdict, her reputation was upheld and the world now knows that Love's statements were false.
"At the end of the day, her biggest asset in life is her reputation," Langberg said. "That she got back today."
Anda sedang membaca artikel tentang
Courtney Love wins Twitter libel trial
Dengan url
http://hiburankehidupan.blogspot.com/2014/01/courtney-love-wins-twitter-libel-trial_26.html
Anda boleh menyebar luaskannya atau mengcopy paste-nya
Courtney Love wins Twitter libel trial
namun jangan lupa untuk meletakkan link
Courtney Love wins Twitter libel trial
sebagai sumbernya
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar